Opals
Gemstones
Jewelry
Coins
您尚未參與本次拍賣。
Exquisite 2.35-carat rhodolite garnet from Burma
- 存貨單位
- 尺寸（毫米）
- 8.5 x 6.5 x 4.5mm
- 重量 (cts)
- 2.35
- Treatment
- No Treatment
- Shape
- Oval
- Type
- Faceted
- Clarity
- VS
- 顏色
-
This exquisite 2.35-carat rhodolite garnet (8.5×6.5×4.5mm) dazzles with its vibrant -pink hue, showcasing the rich color saturation for which African rhodolite are celebrated. Expertly faceted in an elegant oval or cushion cut (specify if known), the gem displays exceptional brilliance with minimal inclusions, catching light with a lively, glassy luster.
| 運輸商 | 運送至：國家 | 運送到世界其他地區 | 聯合運輸（ 巴基斯坦 ） | 聯合運輸（世界其他地區） |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Shipping - Tracked |
|
|
|
|
| FedEx |
|
|
無法使用 |
|
- 存貨單位
- 尺寸（毫米）
- 8.5 x 6.5 x 4.5 mm
- 重量 (cts)
- 2.35
- Treatment
- No Treatment
- Shape
- Oval
- Type
- Faceted
- Clarity
- VS
- 顏色
-
This exquisite 2.35-carat rhodolite garnet (8.5×6.5×4.5mm) dazzles with its vibrant -pink hue, showcasing the rich color saturation for which African rhodolite are celebrated. Expertly faceted in an elegant oval or cushion cut (specify if known), the gem displays exceptional brilliance with minimal inclusions, catching light with a lively, glassy luster.
| 運輸商 | 運送至：國家 | 運送到世界其他地區 | 聯合運輸（ 巴基斯坦 ） | 聯合運輸（世界其他地區） |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Shipping - Tracked |
|
|
|
|
| FedEx |
|
|
無法使用 |
|
We specialize in cut gemstones, faceting rough rare gemstones, and crystal stones sourced from aroun....
-
積極的As per visual and description and a nice addition to my collection.
-
積極的
Nice stone for the price and was shipped out on time
-
積極的
Nice Garnets, good pictures.
-
消極的
I got a stone that was almost totally white in color, appeared to be half the size of a 12.40 ct stone, and the cut and quality was completely different than as described. In short, I got a completely different stone.
為什麼用戶出價高於自己？
出價時，這是一個人願意為產品出價的最高金額。然後，我們的系統將自動代表投標人出價，逐步將出價提高到最高價，以保持其最高出價者的地位。
當出現「自動出價」圖示時，表示我們的系統正在根據投標者的最高出價主動為其出價。這可能看起來好像出價者出價高於自己，但這只是系統更新出價以反映出價者最高限額的結果。
審計
-
描述不准確
-
圖片準確
Comments
Please change the clarity to SI due to an obvious inclusion.
